In July, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared monkeypox a public health emergency of international concern after more than 88 countries recorded cases.
With only 70 current cases in Australia, Australia’s response has been relatively quick, as vaccines arrived on its shores just a few months after two initial cases were detected in May. But that’s not the end of it.
Professor Martin Holt, an expert in HIV prevention at UNSW Centre for Social Research in Health (CSRH), says the country now has a critical period during vaccine rollout that it can’t afford to get wrong.
“With monkeypox, we must avoid a moralizing reaction like in the 1980s when HIV and AIDS were first recognized.
“Using knowledge we have from handling the HIV and COVID-19 pandemics, we must guard against stigma and harmful rhetoric that may inhibit a public health response. Ensuring this will mean an effective and efficient rollout of the monkeypox vaccine, and encourage people to come forward for testing if they think they have been exposed,” he says.
Monkeypox’s parallels with HIV
Like early cases of HIV, recent cases of monkeypox in high-income countries were first noticed among gay and bisexual men.
Monkeypox has been recognized in some African countries since the 1970s and can be passed on by skin-to-skin contact with someone who is infectious, and through contact with shared towels and bed linen.
However, a recent case analysis of the current outbreak suggests monkeypox is mainly being passed on during sex between men. This creates a challenge to educate and inform people who may be at risk while avoiding stigmatizing or judgmental commentary.
“In overseas commentary we can see a tension between saying ‘monkeypox can affect anyone,’ which is technically true, but people most at risk of infection in the current outbreak are gay and bisexual men,” says Prof. Holt.
“Informing people about how monkeypox is being passed on is necessary so people can seek advice and help if they have been exposed, and vaccination if they think they are at risk. What we want to counter is the moralizing response we saw in the early years of HIV in which people were judged or blamed for being at risk.”
The risk of hostile commentary
In the 1980s, HIV was first detected in high-income countries among gay and bisexual men and people who injected drugs. The association of HIV transmission with sex between men and illicit drug use led some conservative critics to react to HIV with hostility, Prof. Holt says.
“Disapproval of homosexuality and drug use fueled hostile public discourse in the early years of the HIV epidemic, and this led to fear, misinformation and stigma.
“What we saw in the ’80s was that some of those who contracted HIV were blamed for the way they acquired the infection, which is a parallel between HIV and monkeypox that public health practitioners want to avoid—that those who are at risk of monkeypox will be blamed for an infection that is not their fault.
“This is where we don’t want to repeat the history of what we went through with HIV—we want to reassure people who may be at risk of monkeypox that they will receive help and support, and that they have done nothing wrong if they think they have been exposed.”
Ultimately, he says, we need to avoid harmful and hateful rhetoric to get on top of the outbreak. Underscoring sensitivities about how the virus is being discussed, the WHO is currently considering changing the name of monkeypox to counter inaccurate and potentially racist connotations.
Abstinence messaging won’t work
There is an argument being put forward by some commentators in the U.S. that public health messaging should tell people to not have sex—that sex is too dangerous right now and that gay and bisexual men in particular should abstain.
“We know from 40 years of dealing with HIV and related sexual health work that sexphobic responses are really unhelpful and toxic,” says Prof. Holt.
“Judgmental responses make people scared to seek help and to want to hide. It’s also demeaning to tell people that they don’t have the right to have intimate contact with anybody else.
“We can encourage people to take sensible precautions, like getting tested if they have symptoms, and to seek vaccination, without generating fear.”
“In Australia, we have a critical moment where we can avoid creating a toxic and unsupportive environment,” says Prof. Holt.
A collaborative and respectful response is key
Australia’s monkeypox public health response is currently focusing on targeting those most at risk (primarily gay and bisexual men who have recently returned from overseas, or who have more sex partners) by communicating via trusted community groups and health authorities. However, while vaccines have landed in Australia and the rollout has begun, it isn’t possible to vaccinate everybody immediately.
“This period, in which vaccine availability is limited, will hopefully only last a couple of months. It’s a critical time in which we people are encouraged to come forward to receive a vaccine or get a check-up, but also to remain patient as vaccine supplies increase,” says Prof. Holt.
“Maintaining a supportive, non-judgmental climate is key, because we know from dealing with HIV that fear and stigma can stop people from coming forward.”
Experience has shown that listening to the community, showing respect and avoiding judgment means that those at risk will respond positively to a call to action like getting vaccinated or getting a check-up.
“Gay and bisexual men are good at responding to calls to action as long as they’re being treated respectfully,” says Prof. Holt.
“In Australia, we can focus on maintaining a positive, community-led, collaborative response and avoid victim blaming.
“We’ve been fortunate in Australia that we haven’t had a media pile-on like in the United States and so we have a great opportunity to respond quickly while commentary is balanced.
Source: Read Full Article